Rule #15 - Do Not Ooze Journalists

If this is your first visit at iScatterlings, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

[Staying off the record used to be a request that was honoured. Not anymore!]

Moer One of these or all of them!
  • BlinkList
  • co.mments
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • muti
  • NewsVine
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • Smarking
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

5 comments ↓

#1 Matthew Stibbe (Bad Language) on 08.20.06 at 8:14 am

I wouldn’t say that you should NEVER trust a journalist. If you know them well, have confidence in their track record, if they have something to lose by betraying a confidence then you might consider telling them something off the record, as background to help them understand the story. On the other hand, you wouldn’t trust a complete stranger with the keys to your car, so why trust a journalist you’ve never met with a secret. There are definitely lazy, immoral, stupid, corrupt journalists out there. There are also honourable, decent, trustworthy, respectable ones. Just like like people in any profession. The words ‘off the record’ on their own mean nothing. Just my two pennies worth. But as a recovering journalist, it always bothers me when people think ALL journalists are bad journalists.

#2 Rob on 08.20.06 at 8:45 am

Matthew, there are exceptions to all professions and I shall always revere the true professionals. Maybe journalist is too strong. Is ‘Reporter’ a better category?

#3 Matthew Stibbe (Bad Language) on 08.21.06 at 7:54 am

I’m not sure I would distinguish between reporter and journalist in this context.

#4 Rob on 08.21.06 at 10:04 am

I an curious at the ‘recovering journalist’ bit! It could not have been that bad! Surely?!

#5 Bad Language / When is ‘off the record’ really off the record? on 07.28.07 at 6:13 pm

[...] story popped into my mind when I saw this cartoon on the super iScatterlings [...]

Leave a Comment